Read the original article here.

---

Wearable Computers: A History of Ambitious Visions and Painful Lessons in Tech Failure

The concept of technology worn on the body, seamlessly integrated into our lives, has long captured the human imagination, fueled by science fiction and the persistent drive for miniaturization and convenience. However, the path from futuristic vision to successful mass-market product for wearable computers is littered with technical hurdles, commercial missteps, social challenges, and outright failures. Studying the history of wearable computing offers valuable lessons in the complexities of bringing disruptive technology to market, particularly when it involves intimate interaction with the user's body and personal space.

This educational resource explores the evolution of wearable computers, focusing on the significant challenges encountered and the notable failures or setbacks that have shaped the field.

What is a Wearable Computer?

Let's begin by defining the core concept.

Definition: Wearable Computer (Body-Borne Computer) A computing device worn on the body. The definition can be narrow, referring only to devices specifically designed to be worn and offering general-purpose computing, or broad, potentially including devices like smartphones (when carried in a pocket or strapped to an arm) or even sophisticated digital wristwatches.

Wearables can serve general purposes, acting as a highly portable form of mobile computing, or specialized functions, such as health monitoring or augmented reality displays. They often integrate various sensors to gather data about the user or their environment.

Additional Context: Mobile Computing Mobile computing broadly refers to technology that allows data and voice to be transmitted over a wireless network via portable devices like smartphones, laptops, and tablets. Wearable computing is a subset of mobile computing, distinguished by the device being worn on the user's person, often hands-free.

Wearable devices can take many forms and be worn on various parts of the body:

• Wrist: Most common today (smartwatches, fitness trackers).
• Head: Glasses, helmets, headbands (augmented/virtual reality headsets, smart glasses).
• Neck: Pendants or necklaces.
• Arm/Leg: Straps for holding devices during activity.
• Finger/Shoe: Less common, often for specialized input or sensing.
• Integrated into Clothing: Electronic textiles or "smartwear."

The Long History: From Abacus Rings to Sci-Fi Visions

The idea of wearable computing isn't new. Depending on the definition, early examples could include:

• 16th Century: An abacus ring or a finger-watch with an alarm owned by Queen Elizabeth I. These were more mechanical calculators or timekeepers than programmable computers but represent early attempts to wear functionality.
• 1960s-1970s: Edward O. Thorp and Claude Shannon's covert timing devices hidden in shoes or cigarette packs to cheat at roulette. While sophisticated for their time, these were task-specific hardware, designed for a single purpose, not general-purpose programmable computers. Thorp's claim as the inventor of the "first wearable computer" rests on a broader definition than the modern, programmable sense.

The modern concept of a programmable, general-purpose wearable computer is often credited to Steve Mann, starting in the late 1970s with backpack-mounted systems. This marks the point where the vision shifted from single-purpose gadgets to truly personal, on-body computers.

Science fiction has played a significant role in popularizing the idea of advanced wearables, often depicting seamless, powerful, and often fantastical devices:

• Augmented Reality Interfaces: Glove-operated holograms (Minority Report), wireframe overlays (KARMA research project mirrored sci-fi concepts).
• Smart Clothing: Communicating or data-collecting textiles (Tron).
• Advanced Displays & Sensors: Threat-assessment glasses (Terminator 2), computerized contact lenses (Mission Impossible 4), infrared headsets (Robocop), sophisticated wrist-worn displays with maps, biometrics, etc. (Fallout's Pip-Boy, Futurama's Wrist Device).
• Integrated Computing: Combat suit armor with embedded systems (Iron Man, Metroid suits).

These visions set high expectations, creating a significant gap between the idealized future and the challenging reality of early hardware limitations.

The Core Challenges Leading to Failure

Developing wearable computers presents unique difficulties compared to traditional desktops, laptops, or even smartphones. Many early attempts stumbled over these fundamental hurdles:

1. Technical Limitations:

   • Batteries: Providing sufficient power for computing, displays, and wireless communication in a small, lightweight form factor has always been a major challenge. Early devices had very limited battery life.
   • Heat Dissipation: Powerful processors generate heat. Dissipating this heat safely and comfortably when the device is worn directly on the body is difficult within size constraints.
   • Software Architectures: Developing robust, efficient operating systems and applications optimized for small screens, limited input methods, and constant "always-on" use was a new frontier.

   Definition: Operating System (OS) Software that manages computer hardware and software resources and provides common services for computer programs. For wearables, specialized or adapted OS are needed to handle limited resources, unique input/output, and continuous operation. Examples include Wear OS (Google), watchOS (Apple), Tizen (Samsung), and lighter RTOS like FreeRTOS and LiteOS.

   • Wireless and Personal Area Networks (WPAN/WBAN): Reliable, low-power wireless communication between wearable components or to other devices (like phones or the internet) is essential but was nascent in the early days.

   Definition: Personal Area Network (PAN) / Body Area Network (BAN) A network used for communication among devices (like telephones and personal computers) in the proximity of an individual user. A Wireless Personal Area Network (WPAN) uses wireless technology. A Wireless Body Area Network (WBAN) is specifically focused on devices worn on or near the body, often for health monitoring (like connecting sensors).

   • Data Management: Collecting, storing, and processing the large amounts of data generated by sensors requires efficient systems, especially when operating continuously.

2. Usability and Form Factor Issues:

   • Input Methods: How do you interact with a computer you're wearing? Early solutions were often cumbersome: chording keyboards worn on the belt, stylus input on tiny screens, or experimental gesture/voice control that wasn't reliable.

   Definition: Chording Keyboard A keyboard that allows the user to produce characters or commands by pressing multiple keys simultaneously, like playing a chord on a piano. Designed for one-handed use and portability but requires users to learn combinations rather than having a key per character.

   • Displays: Early head-mounted displays were bulky, low-resolution, and often tethered. Wrist displays were tiny. Balancing visibility, power consumption, and comfort was difficult.
   • Integration: Making the device feel natural to wear, rather than a clunky addition, was a major hurdle. The "backpack computer" phase highlighted this problem.

3. Commercialization and Market Acceptance:

   • Finding a Clear Use Case: Early general-purpose wearables struggled because they didn't do any one thing exceptionally well that other devices (PDAs, laptops) couldn't do better or cheaper. Specialized uses (like inventory scanning) found more immediate traction.
   • Price: Cutting-edge technology is expensive. The high price tags of early, often underdeveloped, wearable computers made them inaccessible or unappealing to the mass market.
   • Reliability and Robustness: Devices intended to be worn constantly need to withstand daily life, including bumps, sweat, and varying environments. Early prototypes were often fragile.

4. Social, Ethical, and Privacy Issues:

   • Social Acceptability: How does wearing a computer affect social interactions? Devices that looked awkward, intrusive, or indicated constant distraction faced resistance.
   • Privacy Concerns: Devices with cameras or microphones worn on the body raised immediate alarms about recording others without consent. This was a major factor in the public backlash against early devices like Google Glass.
     • Example: Google Glass's ability to discreetly record video led to fears of unwanted surveillance and privacy violations, including specific concerns raised about taking intrusive photos of women.
   • Data Security and Trust: Wearables, especially health monitors, collect very sensitive personal data. Protecting this data from breaches and ensuring users trust how companies handle it is critical and remains a challenge.
   • Regulatory Void: The lack of specific laws governing wearable devices, particularly health-related ones often classified as "general wellness products" (not subject to strict medical device regulations), creates vulnerabilities regarding data privacy and security.

Case Studies of Notable Failures and Setbacks

The history of wearable computing includes several high-profile attempts that ultimately failed to achieve widespread commercial success, offering important lessons.

1. The Dot-Com Era Aspirants (Xybernaut, ViA, Inc.):

   • During the late 1990s and early 2000s, companies like Xybernaut positioned themselves as leaders in general-purpose wearable computing, targeting both industrial and consumer markets. They built bulky, expensive systems with head-mounted displays and belt-worn processors.
   • Why they failed: These companies suffered from a combination of immature technology (poor battery life, clunky form factors), high prices, limited clear use cases for the average consumer, and business challenges. Xybernaut famously filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy (a form of bankruptcy allowing reorganization while protecting from creditors) amid financial scandal. ViA, Inc. also filed for bankruptcy.
   • Lesson: Ambitious visions require mature technology and a clear market strategy. Simply making a computer "wearable" isn't enough if it's uncomfortable, unreliable, and lacks compelling applications at a reasonable price.

2. Panasonic Toughbook CF-07:

   • Known for their ruggedized laptops, Panasonic applied their expertise to wearables in 2002 with the CF-07 Toughbook. It consisted of a "brick" computer worn on the belt or in a pocket, wirelessly connected to a touchscreen worn on the arm.
   • Why it failed: Despite targeting mobile professionals, the two-part system was likely still too bulky and complex compared to evolving laptops and early PDAs. It was "quietly pulled from the market" around 2005.
   • Lesson: Even experienced companies struggle to find the right form factor and usability for wearables. The complexity and multi-component nature of the system likely hindered adoption.

3. Google Glass Explorer Program:

   • Launched in 2013 as an "Explorer Program" for developers and early adopters, Google Glass was an optical head-mounted display aiming for ubiquitous, hands-free computing via voice commands.
   • Why it faced setbacks: While technologically innovative, Glass ran headfirst into social and privacy barriers. The built-in camera led to public backlash and the derogatory term "Glasshole." Users reported feeling uncomfortable wearing it in public due to the perception of being constantly recorded. The high price ($1500) also limited its appeal.
   • Outcome: Google ended the Explorer Program in 2015, stating the project would "graduate" from the experimental lab (Google X) and continue development, primarily shifting focus towards enterprise and specialized applications (Glass Enterprise Edition) where privacy concerns differ and clear use cases exist (e.g., hands-free instructions in manufacturing).
   • Lesson: Technological innovation is insufficient without considering social impact, privacy ethics, and public perception. Intrusive form factors and potential for covert recording are significant hurdles for consumer adoption.

4. Early Smartwatch Attempts (Seiko Ruputer, IBM Watchpad, Fossil Wrist PDA):

   • Before the modern smartwatch boom, there were earlier attempts like the Seiko Ruputer (1998, "mediocre returns"), IBM's Linux watch prototypes (early 2000s, never released commercially despite initial promise), and the Fossil Wrist PDA (announced 2002, delayed until 2005).
   • Why they struggled: These devices were often bulky, had poor battery life, limited functionality independent of a PC (requiring syncing), monochrome screens, and clunky interfaces. They failed to capture significant market interest.
   • Lesson: Early technology wasn't ready for a truly functional and desirable wrist computer. Users needed more than just a tiny, inconvenient computer; they needed a device that augmented their existing workflow seamlessly and offered compelling, always-available features.

Lessons Learned: Why Failures Pave the Way for Success

The history of wearable computing failures highlights several crucial lessons:

1. Technology Must Mature: Early attempts were often ahead of the capabilities of batteries, processors, displays, and wireless tech. Modern wearables benefit significantly from advancements in these areas driven by the smartphone industry.
2. Form Factor and Usability Are Paramount: Wearables must be comfortable, unobtrusive, and easy to interact with, ideally hands-free or with minimal effort. Clunky designs limit adoption to niche industrial uses.
3. Clear Use Cases Drive Adoption: While the ultimate goal might be general-purpose, initial success often comes from specialized devices that solve a specific problem well (e.g., fitness tracking, inventory management, industrial maintenance). The convergence into general-purpose devices like smartwatches happened after core technologies and specific use cases gained traction.
4. Social and Ethical Considerations Are Not Afterthoughts: Products that ignore privacy concerns or are socially awkward face significant public resistance, regardless of their technical prowess. Trust and transparency are essential.
5. Price Must Match Value: Early high-cost, low-functionality devices were non-starters. As technology improves and manufacturing scales, prices become more accessible for the value provided.

The Evolution Towards Modern Wearables

Despite the numerous failures, the underlying desire for wearable technology persisted. The lessons learned, combined with technological advancements (especially miniaturization, battery life improvements, and smartphone connectivity), led to the rise of more successful wearable categories:

• Fitness Trackers: Devices like Fitbit focused on a clear, valuable use case (tracking activity, heart rate, sleep), had simpler displays or no displays, excellent battery life, and integrated well with smartphones.
• Modern Smartwatches: Devices like Pebble (Kickstarter success story), Apple Watch (became the most popular wristwatch globally), and watches running Wear OS built on smartphone ecosystems, offering notifications, apps, and health tracking in a relatively refined form factor. They largely avoided the public backlash faced by head-mounted displays by sticking to a socially accepted wrist-worn form.
• Specialized Industrial/Medical Wearables: In contexts where user needs and regulatory environments differ (e.g., hands-free instructions in a factory, continuous health monitoring in healthcare), even bulkier or more expensive solutions found viability because the value proposition was clearer and higher.

Remaining Challenges and Future Directions

Even with current successes, wearable computing continues to evolve and faces challenges:

• Battery Life: Still a limitation for many powerful devices.
• Input Methods: Moving beyond voice and small touchscreens to more intuitive, natural interactions (advanced gesture control, potentially brain-computer interfaces).
• Display Technology: Making AR/VR displays smaller, lighter, higher resolution, and socially acceptable for wider use.
• Privacy and Security: As wearables collect more intimate data (brainwaves, detailed biometrics), ensuring robust security and building user trust remains critical, especially given the current voluntary nature of some regulations.
• Integration into Textiles: Creating truly seamless "smart clothing."

Conclusion

The history of wearable computers is a compelling illustration of the often-difficult journey from futuristic concept to practical reality. Early attempts were hampered by immature technology, poor usability, lack of clear market fit, and insufficient consideration of social and ethical implications. Companies like Xybernaut and products like the Google Glass Explorer Program serve as stark reminders that technical innovation alone is not enough. The failures of the past provided critical insights, paving the way for the more focused and technologically mature wearables we see today. Studying these infamous setbacks offers invaluable lessons for innovators and entrepreneurs in any field, highlighting the importance of holistic design, market understanding, and responsible deployment of technology that interacts intimately with users' lives.